Now, the earlier mentioned calculations, when done by hand are painstaking. We calculated all these parameters within the span of the framework of just the four scenarios as per example, so that the meaning of the concept is assimilated well. But this operation can be done quicker practically. Generally it so happens that we would have to collect the historic data about the rate of return, and then copies the same on to some spread sheet such as MS Excel or Open Office. With spread sheets various functionalities that are already embedded in the system can be explored, and by now we are aware of exactly which operation to pick. Practically the following might be used:
Table 8.3 has shown values post calculation of the parameters discussed here.
8.5A STATISTICAL NUANCES
In this section of our discussion we have under the presumption that historical information provides us with an unprejudiced monitor to the period yet to come, as is just the case in section 7.1E. This assumption is for computing means, variance, covariance and also betas. Although it is a simplified version, it can also hurl difficulties on our way. This assumption would be more problematic when we deal with mean than any other parameters as covariance, variances and also betas. Ironically dealings with these terms would be at the risk of your own.
Again, there is another minor statistical problem that needs to be brought to light. Statisticians frequently make use of a covariance function, which is mathematically divides by N-1, and not by N. Looking into it sternly, we see that by dividing N-1 is apt if we deal with data from past, also termed as historical database. It is meant for analysis purpose and do not provide us with total population that has likely outcomes. Given a sample finding the de mean wouldn’t provide us with the value of the true average.
The arithmetic division operation using a lesser numerical value, N-1, gives us a larger and an unprejudiced covariance measure. It is at the same time frequently termed as the sample covariance. Against mathematically dividing the same with N is proper if we work with samples rather scenarios that we are aware of to be existent and are similarly probable. In such case, statistics is more often termed the population covariance. Now the alteration infrequently makes a difference in ﬁnance. Here one is in general given many a number of observations, apart from the example we cited- the one where we had four scenarios.
Say for example we notice that dividing N=1000 and N=1001 has no difference in the results.
The beta value will not be affected by any of these circumstances. Hence, there is no need for the statistical ways of computation. Hence, it might be called and referred to as the statistical deviation.
There are much more deviations that are caused by the unknown statistical evaluations. Hence there is a change in the denominator values.
Solve now! Solutions
Links of Previous Main Topic:-
Links of Next Financial Accounting Topics:-