Let measurements of n treatments are distributed to m blocks where,
yij be the observation of i-th treatment for j-th block
For this, the following layout shall be used,
Blocks:
B1 B2——-Bj———-Bm | Means | |
Treatment 1
Treatment 2 |
y11 y12——-y1j———-y1m
Y21 y22——-y2j———-y2m |
.1 |
Treatment i | Yi1 yi2——-yij———-yim | .2 |
Treatment n | Yn1yn2——-ynj———-ynm | .j |
Means | .1.2——-.j———-.m | .m |
Consider this model as,
yij = µ + αi + βj + eij where, i = 1, 2, …….. n and j = 1, 2, …….. m
Here,
µ = Grand Mean
αi = i-thTreatment Effects ()
βj = j-thTreatment Effects ()
eij = Random Errors, these are identically distributed {N (0, σ2)
Hypothesis:
To get the statistic hypothesis, it can be written as-
H0 :α1 = α2 = ………. = αn = 0
Or,
H0 :β1 = β2 = ………. = βn = 0
H1 :At least one value of these effects should not be zero
Constructing the ANOVA Table:
Source of Variation | Degree of Freedom | Sum of
Squares |
Mean
Square |
F |
Treatments | n – 1 | SS (Tr) | MS (Tr)
= |
FTr = |
Blocks | m – 1 | SS (Bl) | MS (Bl)
= |
FBl = |
Error | (n – 1) (m – 1) | SSE | MSE
= |
|
Total | nm – 1 | SST |
Where,
SSE = Error Sum of Squares
SST = SS (Tr) + SSE
It can be calculated as,
SST = Total Sum of Square
=
SS(Tr) =
SS(Bl) =
c =
Where,
Ti. = Total of m Observations for i-th Treatment
T.j = Total of n Observations for j-thBlock
T.. = Grand Total of all ‘nm’ Observations
So,
SSE = SST – SS (Tr) – SS (Bl)
Set up the value of α
It’s Conclusion:
Reject H0: αi = 0 i if FTr> Fα.n – 1. (n – 1) (m – 1)
RejectH0: βj= 0 j if FBL> Fα.m – 1. (n – 1) (m – 1)
Example No. 3
When four students appeared for three different IQ test, the following table has been obtained. The scores are tabulated as-
Students | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Test-I
Test-II Test-III |
75
83 86 |
73
72 61 |
59
56 53 |
68
69 70 |
By using the method of two-way analysis of variance, state the reasons whether these tests are equivalent or not. Assume level of significance = 0.01
Solution:
- As there are three equivalent tests,
H0 :α1 = α2 = α3 = 0
H1 :αi≠ 0 for at least one value of i
Since students’ IQs are equivalent
H0 :β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 1340 = 0
H1 :βj≠ 0 for at least one value of j
- Given:α = 0.01, n = 3 and m = 4
Ftab(Tr) = F0.01, 2, 6= 10.92
Ftab(Bl) = F0.01, 3, 6 = 9.78
- Computations:
T1. = 75 + 73 + 59 + 68= 275
T2. = 83 + 72 + 56 + 69 = 280
T3. = 86 + 61 + 53 + 70 = 270
T.1 = 75 + 83 +86= 244
T.2 = 73 + 72 + 61 = 206
T.3 = 59 + 56 + 53 = 168
T.4 = 68 + 69 + 70 = 207
Thus,
T.. = 825
Now,
c = (825)2/ 12 = 56718.75
So,
SST = 57855 – 56718.75 = 1136.25
SS (Tr) = 226925/ 4 – 56718.75
= 12.5
SS (Bl) = 173045/ 3 – 56718.75
= 962.92
Hence,
SSE = SST – SS (Tr) – SS (Bl)
= 160.83
ANOVA Table:
Sources of
Variation |
Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Square | F |
Treatment | 2 | 12.5 | 12.5/ 2 = 6.25 | 6.25/ 26.81 = 0.23 |
Blocks | 3 | 962.92 | 962.92/ 3 = 320.97 | 320.97/ 26.81 = 11.97 |
Error | 6 | 160.83 | 160.83/ 6 = 26.81 | |
Total | 11 | 1136.25 |
- Conclusion:
Here,
Fcal (Tr)<Ftab(Tr)
Hence,
H0 :α1 = α2 = α3 = 0 is accepted for all the three tests as equivalent
And,
Fcal (Bl) >Ftab (Bl)
Hence,
H0 :β1 = β 2 = β 3 = β4 = 0 is rejected for all the three tests as students’ IQs are different.
Note:
The R.B.D is greatly accepted above the C.R.D. because of its greater flexibility in solving different types of experimental works. This is because there are no restrictions on numbers of treatments along with numbers of replicates. But the fact is that- for the large number of treatments or for the wide variable blocks, the R.B.D. is not suitable.
Problems:
- Three samples are tabulated below. To obtain the hypothesis, consider the population means are equal and level of significance as 5%:
A | B | C |
8
10 7 14 11 |
7
5 10 9 9 |
12
9 13 12 14 |
- From the group of three main brands of certain powder, 120 sales are examined. Allocate these brands of powder considering the table below:
Brands | Groups | |||
A | B | C | D | |
I
II III |
0
5 18 |
4
8 19 |
8
13 11 |
15
6 13 |
- Fours batches of electric bulbs with 1000 hrs. of lives are tabulated below:
Batches | ||||||||
A
B C D |
1.6
1.58 1.46 1.51 |
1.61
1.64 1.55 1.52 |
1.65
1.64 1.6 1.53 |
1.68
1.7 1.62 1.57 |
1.7
1.75 1.64 1.6 |
1.72
1.66 1.68 |
1.8
1.74
|
1.82
|
Show that the significance test is accepted by using the analysis of variance method.
- After conducting five tests in Computer Science paper, the following table has been tabulated with their test scores.
Batch-I | Batch-II | Batch-III |
86
77 81 84 69 |
79
78 82 83 68 |
88
83 86 89 82 |
The test was conducted in three batches. Take the level of significance as 5% for the analysis of variance.
- Construct a two-way ANOVA table using the following data-
Prices of Field | Treatment | |||
A | B | C | D | |
P
Q R |
45
43 39 |
40
41 39 |
38
45 41 |
37
38 41 |
If required, you can shift the origin to 40.
- In a factory, four different workers are hired for working on five different machines. After taking proper observations, some data has been made. You have to calculate in two different ways whether all men are similar in production or not along with the efficiency if each machines. The following has been given-
- Sum of Squares for Variance between machines = 35.2
- Sum of Square for Variance between workmen = 53.8
- Sum of Squares for Total Variance = 174.2
Answers:
- Reject H0 : µ1 = µ2 = µ3, Fcal = 4
- No such difference in the brands
- Reject H0 as the means are different
- ANOVA Table:
Sources of
Variation |
Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Square | F |
Between
Treatment |
3 | 22.917 | 7.639 | 1.0 |
Between
Fields |
2 | 8.167 | 4.083 | 0.534 |
Error | 6 | 45.833 | 7.639 | |
Total | 11 | 76.917 |
- Workers’ productivity is similar to mean productivity and it is same for all the f machines.
Here,
F (Workers) = 2.53
F (Machines) = 1.24
Links of Previous Main Topic:-
- Introduction to statistics
- Knowledge of central tendency or location
- Definition of dispersion
- Moments
- Bivariate distribution
- Theorem of total probability addition theorem
- Random variable
- Binomial distribution
- What is sampling
- Estimation
- Statistical hypothesis and related terms
- Analysis of variance introduction
- Completely randomized design c r d one way classification
Links of Next Statistics Topics:-
- Definition of stochastic process
- Introduction operations research
- Introduction and mathematical formulation in transportation problems
- Introduction and mathematical formulation
- Queuing theory introduction
- Inventory control introduction
- Simulation introduction
- Time calculations in network
- Introduction of game theory